
Three Annuity Objections That Are Often Planning Conversations in Disguise
July 6, 2026
Key Takeaways
- When clients push back on annuity fees, liquidity, or surrender charges, those objections often signal a planning conversation that hasn’t happened yet
- Fee objections usually mean the value of the annuity’s role in the retirement income plan hasn’t been made clear yet. Once it is, the cost question tends to resolve.
- Liquidity concerns are often a planning gap in disguise. Prosperity Capital Advisors’ proprietary Bucket Plan framework solves for this before the product conversation begins, through a dedicated bucket for safe, liquid reserves.
- Surrender charges aren’t a penalty, they’re what allow carriers to offer the features clients actually want. Reframing that for clients changes the conversation.
If you’ve been having annuity conversations with clients for any length of time, you’ve probably heard the same three objections. The fees are too high. They want to keep everything liquid. They don’t want to deal with surrender charges.
Your first instinct might be to answer them with product information. But the more useful move is to recognize what those objections are actually telling you. More often than not, they’re not really about the product at all. Once you hear them that way, the conversation shifts from defending a product to clarifying a strategy.
Objection 1: “The Fees Are Too High.”
When a client pushes back on fees, it’s tempting to walk through the cost structure and explain what they’re paying for. That explanation rarely lands, because it’s answering the wrong question.
The real question underneath a fee objection is usually this: does this product justify what it costs? And when a client isn’t sure of the answer, it usually means the value hasn’t been made clear yet. As Kalem Mackey, CFP®, BPC, our Chief Operations Officer at Prosperity Capital Advisors, often puts it: price only matters in the absence of value. The fee isn’t the problem. The explanation is.
There’s a related version of this objection you’ve probably encountered too: the client who compares annuity returns to the S&P 500 and questions the gap. That comparison puts an apple next to an orange, and it usually means the product’s role in the plan hasn’t been clearly defined yet.
Within Prosperity Capital Advisors’ proprietary Bucket Plan framework, a time-segmented approach to retirement income planning that organizes client assets based on when they’ll be needed, a fixed index annuity belongs in the Soon bucket. That’s the portion of the plan designed for conservative growth and income over the next two to ten years, where the goal is stability and predictability rather than market-matching returns. Its job is to serve as a bond alternative, not an equity competitor.
When clients understand that context, the S&P comparison tends to drop on its own. They’re no longer comparing two products. They’re comparing two different jobs.
[Related: Inside The Bucket Plan®: The Scalable Planning Process Behind $132M in New Client Assets]
Objection 2: “I Want to Keep Everything Liquid.”
You’ve probably heard this one framed a dozen different ways. Some clients say they might need the money. Others say they just don’t like the idea of it being tied up. Whatever the language, the concern underneath is often one of a few things: fear of a market downturn wiping out accessible income, uncertainty around a large upcoming expense like healthcare or a home purchase, or simply the discomfort of committing money they can currently see and control.
It’s worth pausing before you respond with product information, because what’s driving the concern determines how you address it. Each of those sources points can point you towards a potential planning conversation.
The Bucket Plan® addresses this at the planning level, before the product conversation even begins. The framework divides retirement assets into three segments based on time horizon. The Now bucket holds safe, liquid reserves for near-term needs: emergencies, planned expenses, and anything requiring fast access, typically covering one to two years of income. The Soon bucket, where an annuity most commonly belongs, handles the following two to ten years. The Later bucket is reserved for long-term growth.
When that structure is in place, there’s a designated home for liquid money. Liquidity in the Soon bucket should not be an issue because the liquidity need has already been solved one bucket over.
As Kalem says, the need for full portfolio liquidity at all times can speak to a gap in planning rather than a problem with the product. Liquidity gets solved through planning, not product selection alone.
[Related: How to Provide Exceptional Wealth Management for High-Net-Worth Individuals]
Objection 3: “I Don’t Want Surrender Charges.”
Clients hear “surrender charge” and picture a penalty, something the insurance company collects if they need to get out. That framing makes the feature sound punitive, and it’s worth reframing it directly.
A surrender charge is a fee assessed when funds are withdrawn from an annuity before a specified period ends, typically five to ten years depending on the product. That constraint exists for a reason.
If you’re looking for a product that offers complete downside protection, full upside capture, and 100% liquidity all at once, it doesn’t exist. Every product involves trade-offs, and the annuity’s trade-off is explicit: in exchange for a defined surrender period, the client receives features the carrier can only offer because that time horizon is secured.
The annual reset, downside protection, and competitive index caps and participation rates all depend on the carrier having a reliable time horizon for that money. Frame it that way, and the surrender schedule stops sounding like a restriction and starts sounding like the reason the product can do what it does.
Worth noting: bonds are often cited as a surrender-charge-free alternative, but that comparison doesn’t quite hold up. Bonds carry no formal surrender schedule, but if you’ve been managing portfolios loaded with 2019 and 2021 bonds, you know what it looks like to exit a position at a loss when rates have moved against you. That’s an economic surrender charge by another name. Unlike bonds, where that cost only becomes visible at the point of sale, the annuity states the trade-off clearly from day one.
[Related: 4 Ways to Rethink Annuities in Your Clients’ Retirement Plan]
What These 3 Objections May Be Telling You
Fees, liquidity, surrender charges. Each objection is distinct, but they share a common root. When you’re hearing them consistently, it’s often a signal that the planning context hasn’t been established clearly enough before the product enters the conversation.
Annuities tend to work best when a client understands what role the product is playing in their retirement income plan, why that role requires the structure the product provides, and how that structure fits alongside their other assets and income sources. When that picture is clear, many of these objections don’t come up. And when they do, you have a real answer rather than a defense.
Fit still matters. Annuities serve some clients well and others less so, and part of building a sound practice in this space is knowing the difference. When the fit is right and the planning foundation is in place, these three objections tend to answer themselves.
Work With a Platform Built for This Process
The annuity support described above is part of what Prosperity Capital Advisors provides advisors on the platform, including case consultation, suitability review, and dedicated annuity specialists. If you’re evaluating whether Prosperity is the right fit for your practice, we’d welcome the conversation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annuity Objections and Retirement Planning
What are the common client objections to annuities advisors face?
The most persistent objections typically center on fees, liquidity, and surrender charges. Each tends to reflect a gap in how the product’s purpose has been communicated rather than a problem with the product itself. When the planning context is firmly established, these concerns tend to resolve naturally.
Are the annuities clients remember the same ones available today?
Today’s fixed index annuities and registered index-linked annuities are not your grandma’s annuities. They look considerably different from the products of earlier decades. Shorter surrender periods, enhanced liquidity provisions, annual reset features, and flexible index crediting strategies have expanded what these products can do within a coordinated retirement income plan.
Where do annuities fit within retirement income planning?
Annuities can serve as one component within a broader retirement income strategy, depending on client goals. That may mean filling a pension gap, bridging to Social Security, or providing a draw-down vehicle that buys time for growth-oriented assets to remain invested through normal market cycles.
Where can annuities fit within The Bucket Plan® philosophy?
Most commonly in the Soon bucket, the portion designed for money needed in the next two to ten years. Placing an annuity there can provide the time horizon that allows the growth-focused Later bucket to stay invested through normal market cycles without forced distributions.
Are annuities appropriate for every client?
Not necessarily. Clients approaching or in retirement with a meaningful pool of qualified assets and a genuine income gap tend to be the strongest candidates. The Bucket Plan® process can help identify where an annuity could benefit and where a different approach could make more sense.
Learn More: Annuity and Retirement Income Resources
Hear how advisors are putting these conversations into practice. The following resources cover retirement income planning, annuity placement, and building a sustainable holistic wealth management practice.
The Bucket Plan® On-Demand — Episodes covering retirement income strategies, annuity placement, and the planning conversations that drive better client outcomes.
Rainmaker Multiplier On-Demand — Practice-building strategies to help you scale your holistic wealth management firm and serve clients at a consistently higher level.
